Nature v Nurture: Are Genes or Environment More Important?
The age-old debate: are you the way you are because of your genes or your environment? In the nature versus nurture debate, nature refers to all your genetic and hereditary factors, whereas nurture refers to all the environmental factors, including childhood experiences and relationships, the way a person was raised, and their culture. But which of these plays the most important role in making someone the way they are?
It is widely accepted that both nature and
nurture play a role in a person’s behaviour, traits, characteristics, and
personality, but it is frequently debated as to whether they have a 50:50
impact or whether one has more sway over the other. The Centre for Education
and Youth have a very clever way of responding to this question. They begin by
asking ‘how do you work out the area of a rectangle?’. As we all know, we’d
work out the area of a rectangle by multiplying its length by its width; then they
go on to ask, ‘what’s more important for calculating the area of a rectangle,
the length, or the width?’, with the answer, of course, being neither. This is
very simple way of explaining the nature v nurture debate, because, just as
with a rectangle, it is both factors that play an important role in the
product, and it is next to impossible to determine which factor is more
important. Instead, it is the complex interaction between our genes and
environment which determine a person’s behaviour and personality.
This theory is backed up by twin studies. If it
was only our environment which impacted our personality and behaviour, then you’d
expect few similarities between identical twins (who share 100% of their DNA), who grow up apart from one another. However, we have seen that identical twins
share similarities, even if they have been raised
in different environments, suggesting genetic factors play a big role in personality and behaviour. However, twin studies have also shown that there are more
similarities between identical twins if they are raised together, rather than
apart, suggesting that environmental factors also play a big role in
development of personalities and behaviour.
So how exactly do our genes and environment
interact? Let’s look at an example: if a person has a set of genes which help
them build up muscle mass easily, they may perform better in sports, and
therefore play and enjoy more sport. If this person has a child, the child may
inherit the same genes which help build up muscle mass. The child is also more
likely to be brought up in an environment where they are heavily exposed to sports,
both on television and via parental participation, which in-turn may lead the child
to play and perform better in sports too. Therefore, it was the interaction
between the inherited genes, as well as the shaping of the child’s environment,
which impacted the child to perform well in sport.
Overall, it appears that nature and nurture are
both equally important in developing a person’s personality and behaviour. You
can have a gene which increases your likelihood to have a particular
personality trait or behaviour, but it does not wholly determine whether you
will have these traits. Instead, it is our environment which unlocks our genes,
and it is the combination of both nature and nurture which determine who we
become.
References
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-nature-versus-nurture-2795392
https://www.explorepsychology.com/nature-vs-nurture/
https://www.thoughtco.com/nature-vs-nurture-1420577
https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/evpsych/chapter/human-behavior-nature-or-nurture/
Disclaimer
The information in this blog is for
information and entertainment purposes only. I am not a medical professional,
so I have never and will never give medical advice in this blog. You should
always speak to a healthcare professional about your unique health needs. My
opinions are entirely my own and do not reflect the organisations or people I
work for. I only discuss published literature in this blog which are referenced
with links.
Comments
Post a Comment